I’m convinced that if 99% of the world’s scientists (ACTUAL scientists) suddenly announced Global Warming was a crock, Democrats would call them loons.
As it is, Obama said only about a year ago that 99% of the world’s scientists say Global Warming is real.
Put aside the fact that hurricane activity is nearly invisible in the last 10 years, that Hawaii is still above water, and that NASA insists (with photos) that the polar ice caps are increasing.
And forget that new evidence has come to light that climate change and global warming is essentially one giant conspiracy by the Left.
To Democrats, if Obama said it, it HAS to be true.
But those real scientists – the ones that comprise the supposed 1 percent – just keep talking.
“‘Global warming’ is a myth — so say 80 graphs from 58 peer-reviewed scientific papers published in 2017.
In other words, the so-called ‘Consensus’ on global warming is a massive lie. And Donald Trump was quite right to quit the Paris agreement which pretended that the massive lie was true.
What all these papers argue in their different ways is that the alarmist version of global warming — aka Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) — is a fake artefact.
That is, all these different experts from around the world — China, Russia, Canada, the U.S., Italy, etc. — have been looking closely at different aspects of the global warming puzzle in various regions and on different timescales and come to the conclusion in irreproachable, peer-reviewed scientific ways that there is no evidence to support the global warming scare story.
Late 20th century and early 21st century global warming, they show, is neither dramatic, nor unusual, nor scary.
Büntgen et al, below, shows that temperatures in the northern hemisphere were warmer in the early 1400s than they are today:
Abrantes et al (below) confirms the traditional view — which Michael Mann tried to dismiss with his discredited Hockey Stick chart — that the Medieval Warming Period was warmer than anything we have experienced in our own era:
Here’s one from Li et al showing that China was much warmer 8,000 years ago:
Here’s an unusual one from Guillet et al suggesting that there’s nothing new about wildly early or late grape harvests through the centuries:
This debate was always about left-wing ideology, quasi-religious hysteria, and “follow the money” corruption, never about “science.”
Now that the evidence is continuing to point to a massive money scheme, does anyone believe for a second that the Al Gore and the Democrats, the media and Hollywood will admit it?