In the All-Star Line-Up of colossal screw-ups and scandals, the “Flynn Affair” rates on the Richter scale at about a 2.
There is the intriguing part about Barack Obama’s involvement, which ratchets the affair up to about a 3, but for the most part…
When you ask them about the Flynn scandal, they look at you with eyes that say, “Should I order an extra large French fry for me because the kids are always eating mine?”
If you ask a Democrat on the street, you’ll get a similar response.
However, ask a Washington career hack member of the Party of the Jackass and you would think that Flynn was Josef Stalin! (or Mel Gibson circa 2006).
There’s a very good reason Senator Ted Cruz frequently rips apart Leftists, and it has everything to do with their hypocrisy and shocking underhanded tactics.
So, why should we care what the Democrats think?
Well, because SOMEONE illegally leaked the information to the press regarding Flynn and that SOMEONE should be held accountable. Obama’s Shadow Government office down the street on Pennsylvania Avenue should not be able to protect them just because they’re Democrats.
Michael Flynn was asked to resign from his post in February after a transcript surfaced of him conversing with the Russian ambassador prior to Trump’s inauguration.
Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., questioned FBI Director James Comey during a hearing Monday about who identified former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn as the U.S. citizen recorded talking with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
The South Carolina Republican grilled Comey on who is responsible for telling the press that it was Flynn in the surveillance audio with the Russian ambassador, the disclosure of which is a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW…
Gowdy named former President Barack Obama and six of his administration officials as potential sources of the leaks.
Gowdy had one more blunt question for Comey. “Did you brief President Obama on any calls involving Michael Flynn?” he asked.
Comey refused to provide an answer. “I’m not gonna get into either that particular case, that matter, or any conversations I had with the president. So I can’t answer that,” he said.
Well, that about wraps that up, then, doesn’t it?
I mean, no harm, no foul, right? Nothing to see here. Like Benghazi. At this point, what does it really matter…right?
Once again, Obama and his cronies revert to their Chicago-styled procedure of getting things done.
And Michael Flynn is just another hapless victim of an out-of-control Establishment that will hold on to its power with a death grip unlike any other…regardless of who is thrown under the Progressive bus.
Source: Western Journalism