You know it and I know it:
Obama’s NSA was not only spying on private citizens, but on the very people who stood against him and his agenda!
They surveilled Senator Rand Paul, Donald Trump, General Flynn and other high-ranking figures in this government and abroad. Yes, we know they did.
But forget about individuals for a moment.
Did you know our commander-in-chief also spied on one of America’s most sacred institutions?
This afternoon on Fox News Channel, Judge Andrew Napolitano, a former Supreme Court Judge in New Jersey, was talking about the current NSA “unmasking” scandal and how they’ve been using illegally collected metadata.
Judge Napolitano then dropped one shocking bombshell.
“Judge Napolitano: Justice Scalia told me that he often thought the court was being surveilled. And he told me that probably four or five years ago…
If they had to unmask Senator Paul’s name to reveal a conversation he was having with a foreign agent and the foreign agent was hostile to the United States they can do that. That’s not what he’s talking about.
They’re talking about unmasking him when he’s having a conversation with his campaign manager when he’s running in the Republican primary.
During the discussion Judge Napolitano also said Barack Obama could be subpoenaed to testify if he viewed the unmasked intelligence.
The judge went on to explain that the NSA, which has been collecting metadata since 2005 (during the George W. Bush era), has begun to actually use the information they collected for nefarious purposes.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW…
In Congressional hearings last week, both James Clapper and Sally Yates were extensively questioned about the “unmasking” of data from the NSA collected archives.
Senator Charles Grassley, who is in charge of the investigations regarding the leaks that have been occurring in the government intelligence community since Trump won the election, grilled the former Director of National Security and the former Acting Attorney General about their knowledge of this scandal.
The resounding answer was, “I can’t discuss that answer in this forum because of the Confidential nature of the information.”
Let me get this straight: Everything that we talk about (the employer) is open source material for the government. But everything you talk about (the employee) is Confidential and redacted.
Yeah…makes total sense.
Obama’s previously leaked spy list just grows longer and longer, doesn’t it? Who DIDN’T he spy on?
Source: Gateway Pundit