It’s an open secret that President Obama was soft on terror, if not tacitly supportive of it.
Not necessarily because he agreed with the ideology, but because terror as a tool allowed he and the Left to push their agenda.
Towards the end of his presidency, Obama’s policies became more and more disjointed from established anti-terror policies.
Rather than listen to his generals and the will of the people, he began siding with radical Islamic groups and their policy desires.
It has long been suspected, if not outright proven, that one of the radical Muslim groups that influenced Obama and continues to exercise significant control over our government is the Muslim Brotherhood.
Evidence to support this assertion has come to light as a former CIA agent candidly spoke recently about the true motives of Obama and his cronies.
As reported at the Conservative Post, speaking with World Net Daily, former CIA agent Clare Lopez make a shocking admission when she said that America effectively switched sides in the war on terror under the Obama administration.
This belief is apparently shared by several members of Congress, though only talked about in private.
Lopez isn’t some random, low-level person either. She’s the Vice President for Research and Analysis at the Center for Security Policy and a Senior Fellow at The Clarion Project, the London Center for Policy Research, and the Canadian Meighen Institute.
Since 2013, she’s served as a member of the Citizens Commission on Benghazi and as Vice President of the Intelligence Summit.
At the CIA, she was a career operations officer, a professor at the Centre for Counterintelligence and Security Studies, Executive Director of the Iran Policy Committee from 2005-2006, and has served as a consultant, intelligence analyst, and researcher for a variety of defense firms.
She was named a Lincoln Fellow at the Claremont Institute in 2011. Needless to say, her resume is top-notch.
During her interview, Lopez said that in the past, the war on terror was meant to help the world “stay free of Shariah” and Islamic oppression.
But in her view, that all changed when Obama took office and began supporting extremist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood.
She also thinks that the group completely infiltrated the Obama administration and still maintains power throughout the government.
An example of a high-level Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer can be seen in Mohamad Elibiary, an Obama appointee and senior members of the Department of Homeland Security Advisory Council.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW…
According to a report by the Center for Security Policy, Elibiary supports brokering a US partnership with the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist group. Just a few months ago, Elibiary tweeted that a “Caliphate” is inevitable and compared it to the European Union.
Lopez also says that Obama’s plans for the Middle East were essentially the same as Osama Bin Laden’s.
That is, to topple the largely secular, old-guard authoritarians, thus diminishing American influence in the region and opening the door for unknown groups and radicals to gain power.
This is exactly what happened during the Arab Spring.
Lopez certainly didn’t hold back or mince words in her interview. The shocking allegations she makes may appear hyperbolic at first, but facts on the ground support her case.
Even if Obama’s intentions were pure, they’ve still resulted in carnage and mayhem throughout the Middle East.
Obama’s disastrous presidency has really put the US in a bind when it comes to the region. Extreme caution is needed if we’re to pick up the pieces and restore what was lost under Obama.
Source: Conservative Post