Red, White, and Right

News

If You’re White And Blonde, The Liberal Press Has 1 Terrifying Message For You

All the rage these days is for leftists to shame those they accuse of having more “privilege” than the common man.

Of course, the main target of this accusation are straight white men, who have quickly become public enemy number one in America and the West.

But the latest left-wing outrage goes beyond the standard garbage they usually spew, as it now appears that no one is safe from being called out for their supposed privilege.

As reported at the Independent Journal Review, the latest group to be shamed by the Left are the blondes in our lives.

The hair color is often a favorite among men–and women–but some whack-job feminazis are perturbed at the disproportional representation of them on news networks, especially Fox News.

Therefore, “blonde privilege” has now become a thing, because…you know, why not.

While it’s true that Fox News employs an incredible amount of blonde women, many of them unnatural, that’s no reason to whine about it. This has been a trend in television since the beginning of television.

But crackpot Amy Larocca recently penned an article for the rag The Cut, where she bemoaned the number of blondes on Fox in general, especially those that support Trump.

She writes:

But #MAGA, Fox News America is a place where all the classic signifiers of privilege and wealth work on overdrive:

Country-club-issue blue blazers with brass buttons and khaki pants, and above all else, for women, that yellow-blonde, carefully tended hair — a dog whistle of whiteness, an unspoken declaration of values, a wink-wink to the power of racial privilege and to the 1980s vibe that pervades a movement led by a man who still believes in the guilt of the Central Park Five.

Wow.

Here I was under the impression that judging people based on their looks, specifically women, was a bad thing.

Oh wait, when it comes to conservative women and minorities, it’s perfectly acceptable to pass judgement on them for anything.

And it’s really interesting that she thinks of blonde hair as a “dog whistle of whiteness.”

I mean, yeah, blonde hair is a white person thing, is there a problem with that? Is she shaming genetics now?

STORY CONTINUES BELOW…

I wonder what she’d say if someone said “afros are a dog whistle for blackness” in a negative way. I bet she wouldn’t be too pleased; in fact, I can predict an editorial in the exact opposite direction.

In case you haven’t noticed, whites are increasingly under assault in the US. Absurd comments like this are spouted everyday like it’s no big deal, because racism against whites doesn’t exist, or so the Left says.

One wonders at what point will liberals admit that racism against whites exists, probably not before people are murdered because of their skin color.

Even then, liberals might be slow to react. They’re slow by default (“do less, get more” is their motto, after all) and they’re REALLY slow when they’re proven wrong and have to take strides to fix a big problem.

Which is precisely why Trump is in the White House right now. Democrats were too slow to fix anything and further, America learned they’d never, ever admit they were wrong. About anything.

It’s like dealing with petulant, whining eight-year-olds, it really is.

Source: Independent Journal Review

To Top

Send this to a friend